Disclosure: Ten Seats does not currently earn any commission from any link on this site. If that changes, the affected links will be labeled and this notice will be updated on the same day.

What a demo request is for, and why the price is not on the page

A demo form is how the comparison site and the vendor both get paid, and a price on the page would get in the way of that. This site publishes the formula and the dataset instead, so the price is the page.

A CRM comparison page that ranks vendors and ends every row with a "Get a demo" button is not a price list. It is a lead form, and the ranking exists to move you toward the form. That is a legitimate business, and the site I compete with says so in its own words. This article explains how the model works and what the vendor does with the lead. It ends with which of the 36 rows on the provider list publish a price that can be computed without a call.

What does a demo request do for the site that hosts it?

It earns the site the vendor's money, not the visitor's, and technologyadvice.com states this plainly on two pages. Its CRM category page says: "TechnologyAdvice is able to offer our services for free because some vendors may pay us for web traffic or other sales opportunities." (https://technologyadvice.com/crm/, checked 2026-08-25). Its About page goes further on placement: "Advertisers will have some of the most prominent spots on this page, and typically have links back to landing pages on their sites, with UTM codes in the URL to help them track the ROI of their spend." (https://technologyadvice.com/about/, checked 2026-08-25).

Read the two sentences together. The prominent spots go to vendors who pay. The links carry tracking codes so the vendor can measure what each click was worth. A demo request is the event that closes that loop, because it converts an anonymous visitor into a named lead with a phone number. The site earns on the referral, and the vendor earns on the sale that may follow.

Can that site fix it without losing revenue?

No. If the most prominent spots went to the cheapest plan rather than the paying advertiser, the advertiser would have no reason to pay for the spot. If every row carried the effective three-year cost per seat, a visitor could decide without requesting a demo, and the demo request is the product being sold. The ordering and the missing price are the business model, not a gap in it.

This site takes the opposite trade. The formula is published on the Method page. Every provider row is in data.json with its source URL and check date, and there is no ranking, no rating, and no demo form. You can disagree with the formula, and you can rerun it with your own headcount. What you cannot do is pay to move a row, because nothing on the page is for sale. The what a CRM costs page explains what the formula measures and what it leaves out.

What does a "Talk to sales" tier do for the vendor?

It lets the vendor charge different customers different prices for the same plan, which makes it worth more to the vendor than a printed number. A published price is one price for everyone. A "Starts at" price with a sales button is a floor. The number above the floor is set per customer, after the vendor has learned your headcount, your budget, and how far along you are.

HubSpot's Enterprise tier is the clearest case in the dataset. Its pricing page shows "Starts at $150/mo/seat" on annual billing with a "Talk to Sales" button and no monthly price. The same page adds: "Cost shown does not include the required, one-time Enterprise Onboarding for a fee of $3,500." (checked 2026-08-25). Two things are therefore open before you sign: the seat price above $150, and whether the $3,500 fee moves in the conversation. The Professional tier, by contrast, prints $90 per seat per month annual and $100 monthly, with a $1,500 onboarding fee stated as required. That row is computed on HubSpot's page. The Enterprise row is not. The calculator accepts a quoted figure if you have one.

Salesforce Sales Cloud uses the billing term rather than a sales call to shape the price. Its US page marks Pro Suite at $100, Enterprise at $175, and Unlimited at $350 per user per month, each "Billed annually" (checked 2026-08-25). Only Starter Suite at $25 is "Billed monthly or annually". The three upper tiers carry a published price, so Salesforce's page computes them, on a 12-month commitment because the vendor offers no shorter one.

SugarCRM sets the floor in seats instead of dollars. Its Sugar Sell plans are "billed annually" with a "15 user minimum" at $59, $85, and $135 per user per month (checked 2026-08-25). No call is required to see the price, but a 3-seat team pays for 15 seats. Article 01 shows what that does to the effective figure, and the same arithmetic at 3, 10, and 25 seats is in article 04.

HubSpot Sales Hub Enterprise, any team size: (more than $150) × seats × 36 months + $3,500 = not computable

A floor cannot go through the formula, because "Starts at" means the vendor has told you the real number is higher and has not told you by how much. The row stays blank on this site until the vendor publishes a figure. Article 06 lists the plans that publish only an annual price, and article 04 explains the blank cells.

Which providers publish a price this site can compute?

18 of the 22 US rows do, and 2 of the 14 UK rows do. 20 US rows publish a USD price, but Keap prices by contact volume and Zendesk Sell gives no billing basis, so those 2 are shown and not computed. The rest fall into a few groups, and the reason for each is stated on the provider page.

MarketRows checkedComputable seat priceNot computable, and why
US2218 computed (20 published a USD price the checker could read)Zoho CRM served the checker INR; ActiveCampaign draws prices with scripts; Keap prices by contact volume and Zendesk Sell states figures without a billing basis, so both are shown but not computed
UK142 (HubSpot UK, Salesforce UK) published a computable GBP priceWorkbooks publishes a From price; 7 pages could not be read in GBP; 4 showed another currency

^ Source: data/dataset.json, summarized in review-kit/facts.json (us-readable, uk-readable), checked 2026-08-25.

The UK column is the striking one. Eleven of the 14 UK rows are vendors whose pages either would not show a pound price to the checker or showed dollars to a UK visitor. Pipedrive's en-gb page displayed US dollar figures with the line "Prices are VAT exclusive." (checked 2026-08-25). Those vendors stay in the dataset, marked according to what the page did. A vendor's failure to publish a local price is a fact about the vendor, not about this site.

The US "not computable" group is smaller. Zendesk Sell's page states "Pricing plans start at $19/month" without saying whether that is annual or monthly billing, so the row is left uncomputed rather than guessed (checked 2026-08-25). A number with no billing basis is a quieter version of the demo form. It looks like a price, but you have to ask to find out.

Where the answer changes

Who this article is not for

If you already have a written quote from a vendor's sales team with seat count, term, and onboarding fee on it, this article adds nothing. Your number is more precise than any published floor. The only thing left is to put it through the formula on the Method page and compare it with the published rows.

Sources

How this article was made. Written by Kaz, an independent publisher with no commercial relationship with the companies named unless listed on the Disclosure page. All figures come from the companies' own published documentation or regulator publications; each figure carries the date it was last checked. I have not used these products, and nothing here is a personal test result. The arithmetic is shown so you can recalculate with your own numbers. Found an error? Use the contact form; corrections are logged on the Editorial policy page.

Related articles

Written by Kaz (pen name). Figures are copied from providers' published pricing pages on the dates shown. We have not used these products. Corrections: contact form.